Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seth Metoyer's avatar

Your piece is thoughtful, lyrical, and definitely got my brain turning. I loved how you explored the tension between choice and constraint. It’s written with this poetic stoicism-lite vibe, sprinkled with a bit of Nietzsche and wrapped in some truly clever metaphors.

That said, I wanted to offer a counterpoint, because while I agree with your core idea, that real freedom is found in how we choose within our constraints, I think the picture might be more complicated than the essay allows.

You suggest that free will isn’t about infinite options or transcending the past, but about taking responsibility for the choices we can make in the moment. I resonate with that. I want that to be true. But it reads like a clean philosophical conclusion layered over a very messy human reality.

In real life, constraints aren’t always abstract ideas, they’re material and often brutal: medical issues, lack of transportation, mental illness, financial hardship, systemic inequality. These aren’t just “stories we tell ourselves.” They are binding factors. And while agency exists, it often comes down to capacity + access, not just mindset.

I think it’s dangerous to treat all stagnation as surrender. Yes, some people are willfully stuck. But others are stuck despite wanting change, because change takes more than awareness and intention. It often takes resources. And the truth is, with more resources come more choices. That doesn’t guarantee better decisions, but it does offer the power to make them.

Take my 80-year-old mother-in-law. She has the means to replace her broken bed and fix her property, but refuses. She has freedom and options; she’s just not exercising them. And yes, that’s a form of surrender. But there are people out there who would act differently if they had that same 250k in the bank. So while willpower matters, so does circumstance. And when we reduce suffering to mindset, we risk blaming people for conditions they didn’t choose.

You nailed it when you said, “The enemy of free will isn’t determinism, but the victim mindset.” I’d just add: we need to be very careful about who we’re calling a victim and why. There’s a difference between hiding behind our wounds and being actively wounded by systems we didn’t build.

All that to say, I appreciate the spark and the sharpness of your voice. Just wanted to push back on the idea that non-action is always a moral failing. Sometimes, it’s just all someone can do to survive another day.

Thanks again for putting this out there.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts